http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/ Pain For Time Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:41:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21717 John Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:50:07 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21717 155/185/185/205/205/205/185 FORM SUCKS 155/185/185/205/205/205/185 FORM SUCKS

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21718 adam L Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:01:17 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21718 75/105/135/135/135/145F/135 Why is the first one of each set always good and the ones to follow just shite? Grrrrrrr is for grrrrowth. 75/105/135/135/135/145F/135
Why is the first one of each set always good and the ones to follow just shite? Grrrrrrr is for grrrrowth.

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21719 Court Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:51:26 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21719 made it up today..85/95/100/100/105/110/115f made it up today..85/95/100/100/105/110/115f

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21720 Andy Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:08:18 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21720 105/115/135/155/155/165(f)/155 I echo a lot of the other posts...need to get under the bar faster to get heavier. 105/115/135/155/155/165(f)/155
I echo a lot of the other posts…need to get under the bar faster to get heavier.

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21721 Chris Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:04:09 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21721 135/165/185/205 and then the battle ensued failed at 215 tried it again with one failure and one really ugly PR back to 185. Like Will, need to get under the bar with more than slug-like speed. 135/165/185/205 and then the battle ensued failed at 215 tried it again with one failure and one really ugly PR back to 185. Like Will, need to get under the bar with more than slug-like speed.

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21722 rob n Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:09:22 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21722 135/155/155/165/165/165/165 did some for form at 135...form pretty much sucked, needs more work. 135/155/155/165/165/165/165 did some for form at 135…form pretty much sucked, needs more work.

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21723 Travis Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:36:48 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21723 135/145/165/165/175f/175f/155 Like everyone else...form not that good. Had to go back and work on it. 135/145/165/165/175f/175f/155
Like everyone else…form not that good. Had to go back and work on it.

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21724 will Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:25:00 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21724 failure at 195 2 times. not bad, coulda done more but need to get faster hands/arms underbar into rack postion. failure at 195 2 times. not bad, coulda done more but need to get faster hands/arms underbar into rack postion.

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21725 RobW Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:24:04 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21725 135/155/175/180f/180/185f/185f. Definitely need some form work. First time going heavy on these. Lots of room for improvement. 135/155/175/180f/180/185f/185f. Definitely need some form work. First time going heavy on these. Lots of room for improvement.

]]> http://crossfitvb.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21726 curt Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:32:01 +0000 http://crossfitvb.com.ti.sabren.com/2008/04/07/3045/#comment-21726 105/115/125/135 ugly/135 ugly/135 a little better but still ugly/95 for form/reps. Went too high b/f the form was solid. Pretty standard. 105/115/125/135 ugly/135 ugly/135 a little better but still ugly/95 for form/reps. Went too high b/f the form was solid. Pretty standard.

]]>